A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

1. Defendant A around August 21, 2017, at a hearing and audit office of the head of the Si/Gu/Eup/Myeon/Eup/Myeon office of the Si/Gu police station located in 8 Si/Gu/Eup/Myeon, Defendant A, using a bill of accusation in the form of a letter of complaint prepared “in the future, insurance was borrowed from terms and conditions and mixed.”

In the future, the real estate in the future has been leased and used arbitrarily.

"The purport of the above police station is to prepare a written complaint against the defendant's wife B and submit it to the police officer belonging to the above police station with which his name cannot be identified, and on the following day, the above police station received an investigation as the complainant by the defendant Eul as the complainant and issued a certificate under the name of the complainant by forging and using a power of proxy to issue a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the complainant. Using the power of proxy to issue a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the complainant, the defendant used the certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the complainant and used it to obtain a total amount of KRW 1,318,00 won in the name of the complainant and borrowed total amount of KRW 128,000 from C and D as collateral for the insurance proceeds of savings insurance purchased by the complainant from Samsung C and forest, respectively.

“The gist of the complaint was stated to the effect that the complaint was filed.”

However, in fact, B had forged the power of attorney under the name of the defendant and received a certificate of the defendant's seal imprint or used the certificate of his seal imprint, and had never borrowed money by offering the defendant's real estate or insurance claims as security, and even though the defendant agreed to obtain a certificate of a seal imprint or offer his/her property as security for lending money, B was found guilty due to forgery of a private document, and accordingly filed a false complaint against B with the obligees for the purpose of asserting that B's act of creation of security was invalid.

Accordingly, the defendant is aimed at having B receive criminal punishment.