beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고단1662

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 30, 2015, the Defendant, who interfered with business, committed a disturbance for a period of one hour at the E Innitter operated by the victim D in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, for the reason that the victim was not a woman engaged in sexual traffic.

Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the victim's female business by force.

2. At around 01:00 on July 1, 2015, the Defendant: “Around 01:00,” at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), the police officer sent to the police station, upon receipt of a report, set up the patrol vehicle driven by the police officer F, who called the police officer, without any justifiable reason, and opened the steering gate and taken screen pictures on a cell phone for 20 minutes to prevent the patrol vehicle from traveling.

Accordingly, as the police officers dispatched the defendant, the defendant threatened the above police officers with "I am to see, I am to see, I am to am to am to am to am to am to am to, and am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to.

Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning G and F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6-1 year and April) (6-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (a person who has been subject to special punishment] (a decision of sentence] The defendant interferes with the business of a woman, and a defendant interferes with public duties by threatening a police officer dispatched upon receiving a report.