2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession and reflectiveness, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim when it comes to the trial.

However, the crime of this case is organized and planned against many unspecified persons, with substantial social harm, and even though the defendant was merely withdrawn, it cannot be deemed that he took part in the act of taking an essential part in the crime of Bophishing, and it seems that he took part in the crime of this case, in addition to the crime of this case, he could not be deemed to have taken into account various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character, environment, criminal record, motive, means and consequence of the crime, degree of damage, circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.