However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 8, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C to the effect that “I will sell 17 rental cars owned by F Co., Ltd. and repay the remainder, except for the number of units sold in lots, in return for the lending of money.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I will sell 17 rental cars owned by F Co., Ltd. and repay the remainder, if I will lend money within 2 months.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not able to take over the above commercial building, and since the above sirens are owned by F Co., Ltd., the defendant could not sell it at will, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the borrowed money.

As above, the Defendant, as such, obtained the victim’s false statement, KRW 30 million on the day from the victim, KRW 20 million on December 9, 201, and KRW 50 million on the aggregate, and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Certificates of deposit transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the loan certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant is against the defendant, that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, and that the defendant does not have any special