When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 11, 2014, at around 04:20, the Defendant publicly insulting the victims by saying, “A victim F, a police officer affiliated with the Sungnam Police Station Estation, who was a police officer affiliated with the Sungnam Police Station Estation at the above main station, arrested and moves the Defendant’s daily H, who was an employee of the above main station, to a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with business, and the Defendant reported the victims of the crime of interference with business by saying, “A, who is an employee of the above main station, and a non-name customer, will not only take part in it by contact with the Do Office.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;