However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaged in the duties of driving EXE vehicles.

Around 06:30 on June 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license for the vehicle and without obtaining a mandatory insurance policy from the front side of the Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D to the front side of the 572nd day of the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, the ledger of driver's licenses, mandatory insurance, and making inquiries into the chassis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident-related photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8, Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant reflects his mistake, that the defendant has no history of punishment heavier than that of a suspended execution, and that