A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant B, C, D, and E (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”)

) The Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Gsung Foreign Department” (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant’s hospital”).

(2) On October 21, 2013, the Plaintiff is a person who received a sex surgery from Defendant F on his/her own, and Defendant F is a person employed by Defendant B, etc. and worked at the Defendants hospital.

B. On October 15, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) obtained consultation with Defendant F and C on the instant surgery at the Defendants’ hospital; and (b) decided to undergo the surgery on October 21, 2013; (c) on October 21, 2013, the Plaintiff received from Defendant F to undergo the instant surgery on the part of the Plaintiff. (d) On October 21, 2013, the Plaintiff received bring and the external surgery (re-operation); (b) melting the instant surgery; (c) melting the instant surgery; (d) he/she received from Defendant F to undergo the instant surgery on the part of the Plaintiff.

3) On October 28, 2013, the Plaintiff underwent a progress observation with Defendant F. On the other hand, the Plaintiff was found to have been treated as having been on the tape. On November 4, 2013, the Plaintiff removed scambed in the operation department on the part of the Plaintiff’s ship, etc. on November 18, 2013.

5) On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff received secondary local transplant from Defendant F, and on the same day, upon Defendant F’s request, the Plaintiff received from other doctors of the Defendants’ hospital treatment for the bast, etc. with respect to the bast, etc., the Plaintiff received from the other doctors of the Defendants hospital. 6) on April 4, 2014;

6.17.

7.8.

7.29.

8. 21. and 10.7. Additional treatment was provided by the doctors of the Defendants hospital with accelerators.

7. However, on October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff presented the opinion that a physician in charge of the treatment of accelerators continues to perform re-operation rather than performing the treatment of radars. As such, the Plaintiff is the Defendant F with only the Defendants hospital.