beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.02.02 2016고단1932

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 8, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim B, would complete the construction work until July 3, 2015, by paying the internal interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior 102, 103, 102, and 103 of the Busan Shipping Daegu apartment (Seoul) to the victim B. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26359, Jul. 3, 2015>

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not pay about 2 million won of mobile phone charges at the time and did not perform financial transactions in his/her own name due to bad credit standing, and even if he/she was paid his/her royalties from the injured party, he/she did not wish to use them first for his/her personal purpose, such as living expenses, and did not have the intent or ability to normally complete the relevant interior works.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the total sum of KRW 10 million from the same account on June 9, 2015 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the victim, 6 million won from the victim, 12 million won from the same account on June 9, 2015, and 28 million won from the same account on June 17, 2015.

2. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant against the victim F would complete the construction by March 3, 2016 at H located in Busan Shipping Daegu G by paying the cost of interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior 302, Busan, Suwon-gu, Busan, and completing the construction by no later than March 3, 2016.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not pay a fine of KRW 13 million at the time, and was in a situation where the interior construction was carried out unreasonably, and the material price in arrears was not paid. Therefore, even if the Defendant was paid the price for interior works from the injured party, he was thought to be used first for his personal purpose, such as cost of living, but did not have the intent or ability to normally complete the interior works.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, shall be KRW 2 million with the account (K) in the name of one bank under J on the same day as the contract price from the victim, and KRW 9 million with the same account on January 13, 2016, and February 2, 2016.