However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was in the Cheongju-si Office B, in the front of C, and in the front of C, “Awd on the lane” in the Cheongju-si Office B, upon receipt of the 112 report; and (b) was under the influence of the Defendant, who was required to return home to the road from E in the circumstances belonging to the Cheongju-Gu Police Station D District Unit, called “I am under the influence of the Defendant. I am under the influence of alcohol. I am under the influence of the Defendant to return home to the road.”

“In doing so, the part of the above E was flicked on the hand by hand, and assaulted on the left side of the bridge once by walking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: A favorable circumstance in which the nature of the offense is bad: (a) appears to be contrary to one’s mistake; (b) appears to have committed the instant crime by contingently; (c) appears to have not committed the instant crime; and (d) appears to have faithfully lived after the date of the instant crime; and (b) the above circumstances are determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means, consequence, and circumstances before