However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

The Defendants are the one who purchased 286 square meters from the victim E (the age of 63) to live in F at the same time, and had a complaint against the above victim on the ground that the price of the land purchased from the above victim is frighten.

1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. At around September 19:30 on September 24, 2009, the Defendant injured the victim G, while selling the land to the Defendant by the victim and E, the husband of the victim, and the victim, who was not the victim, sold the land to the Defendant, the victim and E, who was the husband of the victim, was in dispute with the Defendant, and the victim did not spread a bad answer against the Defendant, the victim was found to have no son, and the victim's knife at one time with the knife of the victim's knife., after the victim's knife from the way coming from the victim's house to the victim's house, the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

B. On March 201, 201, the Defendant assaulted the victim E in the middle of March 201, 201, at the house of the J, a Eastern resident located in Ha, a Donese-si, Haak-si, Haak-si, Haak-si, Haak-gu, expressed the victim E’s desire to “I see, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., g.).

2. Around September 19:30 on September 24, 2009, Defendant B brought the victim to a tombstone located near the Do of the victim E located in K at Gongju-si, and Defendant B brought the victim to a tombstone, “Is the width, the width of the width, and the width of the width.” The victim threatened the victim.

3...