beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.30 2017나68059

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 16, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased “D” from Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

On the other hand, the Plaintiff purchased was composed of hot water boiler and steves, which connects hot water boiler with trheropty, hot water boiler with tropty, and hot water boiler was manufactured by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and Defendant C manufactured and sold hot water boiler manufactured by Defendant B by combining F’s trheropty with the hot water boiler manufactured by Defendant B.

B. As a result, the Plaintiff’s phenomenon of overheitr’s matropty of hot water boiler (E), which is a component of the hot water boiler (E), purchased as above, returned the said hot water boiler to Defendant C, and used it by obtaining a new hot water boiler (hereinafter “the instant hot water boiler”) from the said Defendant to the Defendant on December 2, 2014, and connecting it to the relevant lease.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant product”), which combines a new hot-water boiler (hereinafter referred to as the “new hot-water boiler”).

On May 28, 2015, the Plaintiff sustained 2 degrees of 17:00 square meters in front of the instant product to cover the instant product and fastened the instant product to the bend, with approximately 4 hours after the 17:00 square meters in front of the instant product, and in front of the instant bend, the Plaintiff sustained 13:00 square meters in front of the left.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Since then, on May 28, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in G Hospital and received a video treatment on June 13, 2015, and was discharged on June 13, 2015, and again discharged the Plaintiff from the next day after being hospitalized in HO on June 16, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry or video of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 9 (including each branch number for those with a branch number) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion 1 purchased the product of this case and used it normally at his own house, and the accident of this case occurred due to the design and manufacturing defects of the product of this case, and suffered pictures therefrom.

Therefore, it is the manufacturer of the instant product.