However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 25, 2019, at around 21:48, the Defendant reported that “C cafeteria” in front of “C cafeteria” located in Chungcheongnam-si B, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant 112 reported that “I will drink and drink at a drinking house, but the State is a criminal on his/her own.” On his/her own, the Defendant, upon receiving the said report, she was asked about the circumstances belonging to the D Zone Unit of the Chungcheong Police Station and the details of the report from E and the 112, and she was asked about the personal information of E and the details of the report from the 112, and she was able to look at the right shoulder of E in the process of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public official duties by police officials on the handling of 112 Reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed on a defendant for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 44-2 (1) and (2) of the Medical Treatment and Custody, etc. Act, taking into consideration that he/she has the same records, but the execution shall be suspended in consideration of the minor extent

Probation and medical treatment orders shall be issued in consideration of the fact that the defendant is highly likely to repeat by alcohol dependence.