A The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[criminal record] On October 29, 2019, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of six months from the date of a violation of the Customs Act, etc. in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch. The judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 2020.

[2] Defendant A is a person who engages in the business of cultivating and selling hobs, etc. under the trade name of “Defendant Company B” (hereinafter “Defendant Company B”) in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to change the form and quality of land without permission shall obtain permission from the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, on November 2019, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authorities, extracted night trees that were planted on the land of 27,177 square meters in total with the area by using the tampers, etc. for the purpose of site creation, and extracted night trees from the area of 27,177 square meters in the area, without obtaining permission from the competent authorities, and changed the form and quality of the land of this case by cutting off and embling the soil of the stairs type at least 2m, and then piling up the form and quality of the land of this case without obtaining permission by means of creating access roads.

B. The Defendant, who failed to comply with an order of reinstatement, was ordered by the Gun Office granting the said paragraph on December 4, 2019 to reinstate the portion of the non-permission form and quality change as referred to in the said paragraph (a) by December 20, 2019, but did not comply with the order of reinstatement.

2. Defendant Company

A. A, the representative director of the Defendant company with an unauthorized change of the form and quality, committed an act of changing the form and quality of the Defendant’s business without permission, as described in paragraph (1) A.

B. A, the representative director of the defendant company, who failed to comply with the restoration order, failed to comply with the restoration order, as described in paragraph 1-B.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement, photograph, location map, and photograph of the public official in charge of the defendant A’s written accusation of the number of public officials given the defendant A’s legal statement, and the measurement log.