2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a certified architect who conducts the design, etc. of a building under the trade name “B” and is a corporation C (hereinafter “C”).

jointly with the Defendant on March 7, 2012 the contract amount of KRW 178,042,00 (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) between the Defendant and the Defendant on March 7, 201

(A) The term “the first contract” refers to a contract for the construction of a new E-sports Culture Center, which is a sports facility (gymnasium), within the period from March 9, 2012 to August 15, 2012 (hereinafter “the term “first contract”).

(2) At the time of the conclusion of the contract, the Plaintiff agreed that the Plaintiff’s construction, structure, and subsidiary facilities of the above service shared the electricity, communications, fire fighting, and equipment by C, and that the Plaintiff and C receive 88% (156,67,000 won) and 12% (21,365,000 won) of the contract amount from the Defendant respectively. (2) On March 20, 2012, the Defendant paid advance payment of KRW 89,020,000 to the Plaintiff and C.

3) After completing working plans on July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted a termination report to the Defendant on July 24, 2012. On July 25, 2012, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the discontinuance of design services on the grounds of the design advisory committee’s deliberation. (B) On July 25, 2012, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to change the purpose of the building from the sports center to the eurton exclusive use site, and to change the design accordingly on July 28, 2012. Accordingly, the Plaintiff accordingly started to perform the design services for the eurton exclusive use site, such as the eurton case, and the delivery procedure. In response, the Defendant and C entered into the contract with the Defendant on October 24, 2012 on the grounds of the increase in the contract amount to KRW 289,60,000,00, and the extension of the contract period to KRW 160,200,000 on the grounds of the extension of the contract period of 20.