On May 24, 2014, around 21:17, the Defendant was a person designated as a thief, etc., and was involved in the case in the Ecom 207 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 1673, B office of the Suwon Police Station B office of the Suwon Police Station of the Suwon-si, and around 15:50 on May 24, 2014, at around 15:50, the Defendant was investigated as to whether he was involved in the case in the victim F (n, 31 years of age).

After being examined, the Defendant entered the above G’s name in the suspect interrogation protocol without authority for the purpose of exercising his right, and forged G’s private signature with a seal affixed thereto, and submitted it to the police officer H as if he had been genuinely formed, regardless of the fact, to which he was aware of it.

Summary of Evidence

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (No. 10 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect examination protocol (Evidence No. 9);

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;