The defendant is an industrial trainee of the nationality of Thailand.

On November 23, 2008, around 03:40 on November 23, 2008, the Defendant talked about “D” on the front side of “D” located on the second floor of the building located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, with E, F, etc., about the victim G ( South, 26 years old) (hereinafter “F”), and tried to take a retaliation against the victim.

In addition, the defendant and E found each item, which is a dangerous object, as a construction site in the vicinity, and the defendant saw approximately 75 cm in total length and approximately 90 cm in total length and entered the above "D" around 05:35 on the same day.

At that place, the Defendant “F was distorted.”

As the item cited as “,” the victim was intending to see the victim as it was, and the victim was no longer h, who was the person of the fatherland who was next to the victim, and E took one time the part adjacent to the victim’s left side of the victim’s eye.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with E to inflict bodily injury on the left side of the snow that could not be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. A report on investigation (to photograph photographs of suspects);

1. A report on investigation (referring to cases of seizure of evidence 1 or 2);

1. Protocol of seizure, list of seizure - Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The scope of punishment by law: One to ten years of imprisonment;

2. Not setting the sentencing criteria: With respect to the special injury offenses, the sentencing criteria are not set, unlike those in which the sentencing criteria are prepared for the offenses of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.).

3. The fact that the defendant who was sentenced to the punishment of this case recognized the crime of this case and appears to have repented of the mistake, and that the defendant is the first offender who has no record of the crime, etc. is considered as extenuating circumstances for the defendant.

However, this shall not apply.