전세권설정등기말소
1. The defendant received on November 19, 2001 from the original registry office of this court with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.
1. The defendant completed on November 19, 2001, the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon (hereinafter referred to as the “registration of chonsegwon”) with respect to the building listed in the annexed sheet (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) from November 19, 2001 to April 6, 2003.
On December 12, 2003, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant building.
On September 8, 2003, the defendant filed a move-in report with Yong-gun C on September 8, 2003, and from April 26, 2004, other persons completed the move-in report and reside therein.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The judgment of this case is deemed to have expired on April 26, 2004, which appears to have been a director of the building in this case after making a move-in report to another address at the latest. Thus, the defendant is liable to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis to the plaintiff.
(Y) Even if the Defendant did not refund the deposit money from the Plaintiff, the extinctive prescription of the Defendant’s claim for the return of the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis shall begin to run from April 26, 2004, which was directors of the instant building at the latest, and ten years thereafter, the Defendant’s claim for the return of the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis had already expired due to the expiration of the extinctive prescription before the instant lawsuit was filed).