However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is between the victim B and the elementary school.

No one shall repeatedly send any codes, text, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network to any other person.

Nevertheless, on September 18, 2013, the Defendant repeatedly transmitted text messages with the victim's handphone using the Handphone used by the Defendant at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, which read "I will have been able to do so even if I do not have any ability to be able to do so, but if I would have died only on the ground, I would have been able to do so only on the ground, I will be able to do so." From that time to December 29, 2014, the Defendant repeatedly transmitted 37 text messagess that cause uneasiness to the victim, such as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning submission of documents by complainants;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his/her mistake, and that the defendant has no record of punishment otherwise than