The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

피고인들은 G 교각 하부에 컨테이너박스를 설치하여 놓고 재활용품을 수집, 분리하여 나오는 수익금으로 생활하는 가칭 G 넝마단체 회원들이었다.

피고인들은 2012. 10. 2. 15:20경 서울 강남구 H 앞길에서, 위 G 교각하부에 불법시설물을 설치하고 확성기(앰프)를 크게 틀어놓아 이에 대한 민원이 발생하였다는 이유로 강남구청 건설관리과 소속 지방행정주사보 I 외 10명이 위 불법시설물에 대하여 철거대집행을 하려고 하자 위 넝마단체 회원들과 함께 은행껍질을 썩힌 내용물을 비닐봉투에 담아 투척하는 등 1시간 40분 가량 이를 저지하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate execution of administrative vicarious execution by public officials of the Gangnam-gu Office by multiple force with the above organization members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement made by the police officer against I and J;

1. Statement prepared by the I;

1. Application of video Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of field bonds;

1. The Defendants: Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants’ act is a passive resistance, which constitutes a legitimate act under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, and thus, illegality is excluded.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the instant vicarious execution was necessary due to the existence of a container installed at the lower part of the school, which is, the majority passed, and the need to maintain the container at the lower part of the school, and the instant act committed by a public official after preparing for the contents of a bad malodor in advance is difficult to view that the instant act was reasonable, and the time is also difficult.