A shall be punished by imprisonment of 10 months and fine of 2,00,000 won, and imprisonment of 6 months and fine of 1,00,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants jointly operated a commercial sex acts business establishment with the trade name of “E” in sub-city Ctel D, and Defendant B served as the role of receiving telephone from the above officetel’s lease and sex purchase to inform the address of the above business establishment. Defendant A, while serving as a liaison with commercial sex acts women, agreed to distribute half of the profits generated from the above business establishment.

Accordingly, around May 22, 2019, the Defendants received 9-170,000 won for each course from the sexual purchasing members who found the above business advertisement at the Internet sexual traffic advertising site F at the above business establishment and caused G workers engaged in sexual intercourse with the above customer.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Lease contract or full certificate of registered matters;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the internal photograph, H dialogue, and F Advertisement of the business establishment;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Defendants who choose the punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor and fines concurrently; Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on a suspended sentence: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The crime of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment because of the lack of social harm such as the commercialization of sex and the harm to a sound sexual culture and good morals; the Defendants committed advertising acts using a medium with high radio wave such as the Internet; the Defendants recognized the facts charged; the contents and size of the business as indicated in the judgment; the Defendants appears to have suspended their business; and the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, and criminal records are once the amount of fine imposed on the Defendants for the same kind of crime.