However, each of the two years from the date of the final judgment against the Defendants.

1. On April 13, 2014, Defendants A and B received 112 reports from D restaurants located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu Seoul and received a warning from G that they would not go to the employees of the Seoul Gyeyang Police Station Emba, and that they would go to the trial.

The Defendant’s body added the above G to it, and collected scams on the floor surface of the said G, and assaulted the F’s KON to walk the left scam and walk the left scam.

Defendant

B took part in this, he expressed that “I will arrest the husband of the Republic of Korea, I will see our body, I will see the body, I will am dead, I will do so, and assault a larlar.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the crime control.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On April 13, 2014, at around 09:00 on April 13, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim I, who works as an employee at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for a period of about one hour by avoiding disturbance, such as spiting spits on the floor, which is a larger so that Korean women are smelled, and that spits down on the floor.

B. On April 13, 2014, at around 10:20, the Defendant: (a) was arrested on a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason at the place indicated in the preceding port; (b) the Defendant, who was parked in front of the said place, removed the door of door-to-door protection of the market value, which was attached to the patrol vehicle No. 24 of the patrol vehicle at the front of the said place.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the patrol car, which is an object used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged parts of the patrol vehicle;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the defendant A who has selected punishment for the crime: the defendant B, who is under Articles 136(1), 30 (a), 314(1) and 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstruction of performance of official duties), respectively;