For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the general traffic obstruction among the facts charged in the instant case, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles on the obstruction of general traffic.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no evidence of objection against the guilty part in the final appeal and the reasons for the final appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.