beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.06.07 2018고합38

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who served as an insurance designer at D branch offices in Jinju City from around 2006 to June 2017 (hereinafter “Lind Life”) in Jinju City.

1. Crimes against victims E;

A. On January 10, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) has contributed to the Defendant’s “G office” in the “G office” of the victim E’s operation in Jinju-si on January 10, 2014.

When making an investment of KRW 230,000,000 to February 9, 2017, the 20th day of each month from January 8, 2014 to February 9, 2017, which is the investment period, and the principal will be paid at maturity with the dividend of KRW 3450,000,00. The letter "KYOBO" as if there were actual goods, and the letter "Korea Consumption Association at the Support Group for the Teaching Life of Teaching Life" was printed in the same letter, and the document number "support 2014-11-24, etc." was presented to the victim.

However, in fact, there is no such special-use investment product, and the defendant voluntarily prepared the subscription form for the above investment contract, and even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he was thought to be used for the purpose such as repayment of personal debt, and there was no intention to deposit it in any form.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was transferred KRW 40 million in total to the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the injured party at the end of the foregoing false statement, as well as KRW 510 million in total under the name of the investment in the investment goods for special marketing life, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table (1).

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. The Defendant, as stated in the preceding paragraph, was urged by deceiving the victim and received property by deceiving him/her, and then requested the victim to request the insurance policy to be admitted as evidence for the delivery of investment funds. < Amended by Act No. 12215, Jan. 17, 2014>