However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 2, 2019, the Defendant damaged the property by getting off from a D-si vehicle operated by the victim C in front of the front of the Eup/Myeon on February 22, 2019, and without any reason, without any reason, the breath window of the above string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2019.

2. The Defendant committed the act of obstruction of performance of official duties, as described in the above paragraph (a), with the police officers who fright to wear the fright to wear the fright to wear the fright to wear the fright to wear the fright to wear the fright, and as the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to wear the fright to set the fright to remove the Defendant, and the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to set the fright to stop the Defendant, and committed the act, such as removing the fright to set the fright to cut off the

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. The image photograph of a damaged vehicle, and the color photograph of the police station which is removed;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (attached estimates for vehicles);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, damages the property without any reason, and assault the police officers dispatched to commit the crime.

However, the fact that the defendant made repayment to the victim of the damage of property and that the defendant has been punished five times a fine, but there are no records of the same crime, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime.