Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 15:00 on November 25, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case violating the Labor Standards Act against Ulsan District Court No. 404, the law of Ulsan District Court No. 404 on the law of Nam-gu, Ulsan District Court, and took an oath.

In making an oath and testimony as above, on June 10, 2012, the Defendant did not expressly agree that the remainder of the construction cost to be received after the Defendant and C, D, and E should be distributed equally, and even though the Defendant did not accurately know it, the Defendant responded to the prosecutor’s question “I would like to know that D and E should not receive daily allowances, and that I would like to agree clearly that the Defendant would equally distribute the remainder of the construction cost to be received after the Defendant and C, D, and E, and testified that the remainder of the construction cost, other than the cost, should be distributed equally on the same page and that the Defendant would be aware of such fact.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Protocols and records of examination of witnesses, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions (a confession before judgment on an increased case becomes final and conclusive);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;