The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds for appeal) on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the “purpose” in the crime of violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.