A. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that, on November 18, 2016, the Plaintiff lent KRW 140,000 to the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 140,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

B. As to the defendant's assertion, the defendant asserts that the above KRW 140,000,000 was a gift to the defendant, so there is no obligation to return it.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged based on the overall purport of each statement and pleading of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 19 (including each number), i.e., the plaintiff transferred KRW 140,00,000 to the defendant on November 18, 2016, and the balance of the above Muss passbook (-) 250,720,010 won after the transfer, ② the plaintiff has legal spouse and children, ③ the evidence submitted by the defendant alone cannot be recognized that the plaintiff has maintained a de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the above loan 140,000,000 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 11, 2017 to the date of full payment, as the Plaintiff seeks.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.