beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.08 2017가단25397

각서금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 41,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from November 21, 2017 to June 8, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. On May 18, 2010, the Defendant prepared and delivered each of the following documents with respect to property relations, bringing up children, and marriage (hereinafter “each of the instant documents”) to the wife, and agreed with the Plaintiff, the wife, who was the wife.

In the event that the Plaintiff and the Defendant are in charge of the Plaintiff’s divorce, all of the following shall be implemented:

1. Subsidizing living expenses until ASEAN becomes an adult (legal amount of KRW 800,00 per month);

2. C shall subsidize school expenses until university graduation.

3. To delegate the rental deposit for apartments currently residing in the Plaintiff.

4. All cash currently owned by the Plaintiff shall be delegated to the Plaintiff.

5. He shall delegate 700 square meters of forests and fields located in Yangyang-do to the Plaintiff.

6. Subsidization of funds for the marriage ceremony for his/her dependants;

(60 million won) The defendant promises to comply with the above

B. On August 29, 2010, the Defendant’s father-Defendant’s son D was married and completed the marriage report thereafter. On May 10, 2010 to August 23, 2010, the Defendant transferred only KRW 19,000,000 to the Plaintiff for a total of four times as D’s marriage funds.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-4 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 60,000,000 for marriage support on the basis of the instant written statement as to whether a civil liability under the instant written statement was established, and the Defendant did not claim that the mutually advantageous support promise is not a mutually advantageous support promise, but did not bear any legal obligation.

In light of the fact that the preparation process, contents, and the amount of the marriage subsidy as mentioned above are specified in the premise, each of the above contents is prepared to fulfill the conditions of the premise of divorce, and it is determined that the portion of the D marriage fund is not only the mutually advantageous support promise but also the intention of civil liability burden.

B. According to the specific premise of the obligation to pay marriage subsidies, the Defendant is married to the Plaintiff as stated in the instant text.