2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of the same repeated crime despite having been punished several times of imprisonment for a single criminal act; (b) the Defendant sold or arranged phiphones to another person without being subject to the administration of phiphones; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, are unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.