2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On November 10, 199, the plaintiff and China's nationality C had one male (15 years old) and one female (16 years old) under the chain of law as a married couple who completed a marriage report.

B. C calls for divorce with the Plaintiff, and left home on October 2, 2015, but the Plaintiff did not intend to divorce with C.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is responsible for paying consolation money for mental suffering to the plaintiff, since he committed an unlawful act, such as establishing the plaintiff's wife C, which is the plaintiff's wife.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the witness C’s testimony, the CD verification result, and the overall purport of this court’s pleadings, the following facts are acknowledged: ① the Defendant stated in the Geum Park Park Park on October 8, 2015 that “A and the rights were five months, and the slaughter was combined, one month,” ② the name of the lessee of the Mabyang’s Mabyang located in C around that time, was the name of the Defendant; ③ the Defendant and C were in the same room as “D” on October 16, 2015. < Amended by Act No. 13582, Oct. 8, 2015>

C. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the foregoing evidence, i.e., that the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff “five months of private rights and one month of the sum of slaughters,” is merely due to the Defendant’s receipt of the C’s request seeking divorce from the Plaintiff, and the Defendant actually went to C.

The fact that it cannot be deemed that either she or she was combined with her studio, and the (B) “D”’s her own account is deemed to have leased the money borrowed from the Defendant on its own account, but it appears that C had the lessee registered in the name of the Defendant to secure the money borrowed from the Defendant as the above studio lease deposit, and otherwise, the Defendant leased the above studio and caused C to live in it.

B. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant did not peep with C, and on October 16, 2015, the Defendant was at the “D” room for the purpose of conducting a puppering.