beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.01.14 2020고단5006

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Presumption Facts] Under the presumption of premise, the members of the phishing fraud team committed fraud such as delivering money to an unspecified number of unspecified persons for repayment of the existing loan instead of repayment at low interest because it is possible to lend the loan at low interest by misrepresenting an unspecified number of employees of financial institutions, employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., or allowing the Financial Supervisory Service, etc. to give a low interest loan when repaying the existing loan. In short, the Defendant conspired to do so under the direction of the employees of the phishing Fraud Co., Ltd., the Defendant: (a) deposit the victims with the account designated by the influencing person; and (b) deposit the victims with the account by misrepresenting the employees of the financial institution, etc.; and (c) deposit the victims into the account designated by the influencing person under the direction of the employees of the phishing Fraud; and (d) deposit the victims with cash in return for allowances of 2

[200 Highest 5006]

1. On September 17, 2020, an employee of the phishing fraud team in the name of the crime against the victim B was made by calls to the victim B on September 17, 2020, to provide a loan counseling by misrepresenting that the victim is a staff member of the financial institution C, to install a sign board indicating the source of the victim, and to receive an application for the loan. On the same day, it is a breach of contract to apply for a loan of KRW 30 million again in C without repaying a low-scar bank loan to the victim at around the same day.

If a penalty is not repaid 9.6 million won, it shall be an bad credit holder.

As the thesis that will be sent to our company's employees, it is immediately resolved when preparing and delivering cash so that it can be repaid for existing loans.

“Falsely speaking,” and the Defendant instructed the victim to deposit the account without passbook in the account informing the victim after receiving cash from the victim, such as the said D bank staff.

Accordingly, on September 17, 2020, the Defendant met the victim at the F cafeteria located in Seo-gu, Gwangju on September 17, 2020, and received KRW 9.6 million in cash from the damaged party in the name of the repayment of the loan.