However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2014, the Defendant, at around 08:45, 00, cited 50,000 won of cash owned by the victim E on the PC table, and 50,000 won of the market price, and 1,00,000 won of the cash owned by the victim, which was on the PC table, using gapss between toilets, at around 08:45 on May 18, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

3. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Determination of Pronouncement of Punishment] Types 2 (General thief) (General thief) [Special thief] - [Scope of Recommendation] - From April to October (Scope of Suspension of Execution] - Main Reference Grounds : negative Cumulative Crimes - No positive Reference Grounds - General Reference Grounds : Decision of Pronouncement of Punishment: Decision of Punishment - Decision of Punishment / General Reference Grounds : Suspension of Execution by taking into account each of the above circumstances and taking into account the following circumstances, and probation should be imposed as the same type of crime is repeated.