beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.02.13 2017고단2150

폭행

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 24, 2017, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Victim C was posted a door for a gas regular inspection before the Defendant’s house located in 105 Dong Dong 1405, Dong 1405, Dong 1405, on September 24, 2017; and (b)

Chewing Chewing

“Absently, assaulted the victim by destroying the part of the victim’s ship once more than once.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On February 12, 2018, the agreement containing an expression of intent that the injured person does not want to punish the accused was submitted to this court after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.