However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:45, at the top of the D cafeteria located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si; (b) at the front of the D cafeteria, the Defendant took a bath of the victim E (19 years old) who is a senior dong-gu, which is not good among ordinarys, and was punished by the Si expenses. The Defendant took part in the victim’s face who was frightened and frighted to walk from the victim’s face when the victim’s head was fright and was frighted, and then the victim’s fright to take part in the victim’s face until the victim’s friendship F, who was frighted, speaks the Defendant.

In the end, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as blood transfusion, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Investigation report (ten pages of evidence records);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV photographing photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines / [the scope of the recommended punishment / [the scope of the punishment / the general injury to a violent crime>> the Class 1 (general injury to a person in general) (from February to one year) of the general injury reduction area (including the person who has been specially mitigated) of the mitigation area (including the advanced efforts to recover damage);

2. The sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, family relationship, family environment, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, shall be set as ordered in full consideration of the following circumstances:

3. Unfavorable circumstances: The circumstances that are favorable to the nature of the crime of this case are not good in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case: The defendant led the crime of this case; the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case; the defendant agreed smoothly with the injured party; the defendant suffers from disease such as sporad, sporad, etc. in sporadic explosive disorder and middle sporadic depression; the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; the defendant's parents are leading the defendant.