손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 32,983,676 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual 5% from November 18, 2011 to September 30, 2016, and the following.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) B is a vehicle C around November 18, 201 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 18:20 on November 18, 201.
2) On the other hand, the plaintiff driving his vehicle and parked his vehicle on the road in front of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, and driving his vehicle on the road in front of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, and driving the vehicle in front of the road at a speed of about 5km in speed of the speed of 5km in speed above the stop line in front of the road in front of the direction of the defendant vehicle, due to the negligence that the plaintiff driving the road without permission on the front side of the defendant vehicle and driving the steering and steering system in front of the road in front of the speed and did not properly operate the steering and steering system, and the plaintiff driving the road in front of the road in front of the left side and suffered an injury, such as cutting down of the plaintiff's upper right-hand Walle of the defendant vehicle open to the right side (hereinafter referred to as the "accident in this case").
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
3) The Plaintiff, who was diagnosed by both high bloodless typosiss on April 17, 208 and received a diagnosis on April 17, 2008 and received a pension equivalent to the third degree disability from the National Pension Service on July 28, 2009, received a high-ranking re-operation on the left-hand typology on the right-hand typology on November 10, 2010, and received a pension equivalent to the third degree disability from the National Pension Service on July 28, 2010. At the time of the instant accident, it is reasonable to view the Plaintiff’s disability rate by applying the vocational coefficient 5 to be 27.75% [15% (100-15%) x 15%] of the Plaintiff’s disability rate due to the disability in the front typologys x 15% [this ground for recognition: facts without dispute, evidence Nos. 1 through 3, evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (hereinafter the same shall apply); the purport of the court’s opinion on this issue.
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.