A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had a previous conviction in several times, strict punishment against the defendant is needed.

However, considering the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, that the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victims, and the age, sex and environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is judged appropriate and is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.