However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on April 17, 2016, the Defendant was drinking together with the victim D(C) at the “C” entertainment station operated by the Defendant located in Yangsan-si, around 01:0, the Defendant did not take an examination by reporting that the said victim was mixed with the Defendant’s desire to take an examination on other post-the-counters, and did not take an examination. However, the Defendant did not hear the Defendant’s oral statement, and written off the Defendant’s appearance as if he was off from the Defendant’s hump and hump to the Defendant, and written the Defendant’s hump.

On the ground that she was called “Ilves” and she was called “Ilves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves the victim’s face and hair when Ilves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves Blves the victim’s left eyeblves and she

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes stating D in the protocol of interrogation of the police to the accused;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; Articles 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant can have the same criminal records for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the fact that the degree of assault is not less than that of the defendant, is against the disadvantage, the fact that the victim is