beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.02.15 2015고합110

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

The Defendant conspiredd to import Memphographs (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) from “D” who resides in C and China, to import Memphographs (one philopon; hereinafter “Wlopon”).

1. Import of philophones;

A. On March 18, 2015, the Defendant imported the instant Handphone, along with C, by directly receiving C in the vicinity of the port E-gu, south-gu, 203, the residence of C on March 18, 2015, while concealing approximately 10 g of Handphones into a chophone in front of her table, and sending it to an international special transport freight.

B. On April 2015, the Defendant imported approximately 10 ghonphones sent by Police Officers D by the same method, at around April 21, 2015, at the same place as the above paragraph A, and imported the said phions with C, by directly receiving C at the same place as the above paragraph A.

Accordingly, the defendant imported approximately 20 g phiphones from D in China in collusion with C.

2. Medication of phiphones.

A. On March 2015, the Defendant 1-1 (a) put approximately 0.3g of the penphones imported from D in the residence of paragraph C, and 0.3g of the rophones imported from D, put them into the rophone inhaled in the rophone inhaled body, added the rophones into the rophone inhaled body, and administered the rophones in the way of inhaleing the rophones into the cos and the ropped body in order;

(b) Medication approximately 0.3 g of philophones in the same manner at the same place as C on the day following the date and time set forth in paragraph A, together with C:

C. On April 2015, Police Officers C, approximately 0.3g of philophones imported from Section 1-B, as well as Eul, administered them in the same manner as Paragraph A.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to administer phiphones three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Seizure records;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. Investigation report (report on photographing seized articles and measuring the weight of seized articles);

1. Attachment of the current status of philophone receipt on the basis of the Customs List by Customs Holder, a F dialogue message between A and C, and a C Busan Busan Bank Account Account Account related to A’s philophone purchase price.