Examining the record in light of the relevant legal principles, it is justifiable for the lower court to have convicted each of the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations or by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience, or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles or omitting judgment.

On the other hand, without mentioning the specific reasons, it is not a legitimate ground for appeal that the court below's assertion that it has reached the substance of punishment, such as additional punishment for an offense against which no prosecution has been instituted against the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.