When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On May 14, 2017, the Defendant driven a Bi30 vehicle from the 10km section to the front road of the city in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, Gwangju, with a alcohol level of 0.21% in alcohol level among blood transfusion around 23:21, the Defendant driven the Bi30 vehicle from the 10km section to the front road of the city in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about the results of reply to requests for appraisal and regulations on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

The defendant does not commit a second offense.

There is a family member to support the defendant.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant's blood alcohol concentration is considerably high, and the crime of this case is not likely to be repeatedly committed despite the fact that he/she had been punished once due to drinking (2014).

Considering the risk of accidents caused by drinking driving, strict punishment is needed for these crimes.