도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On July 29, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by the Suwon District Court due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.
On November 1, 2019, the Defendant, as a person who violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving, drive a F Sti-type car at approximately 500 meters away from the front of the “C” in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, to the front of the “E” located in Suwon-si D, Suwon-si, the Defendant driven a car at a F Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.048% under the influence of alcohol level of 0.048%.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;
1. Records of judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of criminal records of a suspect's drunk driving);
1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of this case is that the defendant, who has a record of driving a drinking alcohol, drives a motor vehicle again, and the nature of the crime is not that of the latter.
However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the blood alcohol concentration by drinking of this case is not high, and the defendant has no other criminal records other than the above one fine prior to the above one time, and the defendant has no other criminal records, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and result, etc., as stated in the records, are determined as ordered by taking into account the various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the circumstances after the crime.