When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. No person who violates the Road Traffic Act shall throw any stone, glass bottle, metal scrap, or article likely to cause damage to any motor vehicle or horse;

Nevertheless, at around 02:00 on August 13, 2016, the Defendant broken the beer's disease, which was brought by the Defendant, on the road in front of the F police box located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu.

2. When the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, at the time and time stated in paragraph (1), committed an act as described in paragraph (1) from a police officer during the influence of alcohol within the said F police box office, the Defendant took a bath for about 15 minutes, such as “Fuk ypu and spule spris.” The Defendant saw the police officer at the place where the police officer was under influence of alcohol to take a bath, cut off the tables by hand, cut the sound, sprinked on the floor, sprinked on the floor, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

3. On August 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 04:50 on August 21, 201, 2016, at the main point of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, and the third floor; (b) using the gap in which the victim D, the victim C, and C placed a cellular phone on the tables in which the victim’s location is located, the Defendant used one mobile phone with the victim’s DNA 6S mobile phone with the amounting to KRW 900,000,000 in the victim’s market price; and (c) one mobile phone with the gallon 5,0500

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written statement of control, a written statement of main records, and a statement of main records;

1. On-site photographs, video images of video CDs and defense counsel did not have the criminal intent to avoid an disturbance in the process of expressing the answer in the process of expressing the answer as the Defendant did not have a language in the process of resisting that the crime was lost. On-site photographs and video CDs, the Defendant and defense counsel did not have the criminal intent to commit the crime under paragraph 3 of the same Article.