However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On March 31, 2017, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gwangju District Court.

On April 25, 2020, at around 02:59, the Defendant driven a B SP car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.131% from around 300 meters to around the public toilets in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 40-ro 50-gil, as it was in front of the public toilets in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant driven a B SP car with a alcohol level of 0.131%.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (limited to a summary order of violation of the Road Traffic Act);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;