2. The judgment defendant is against the crime of this case and has no record of criminal punishment of suspension of qualification or heavier punishment.

However, the crime of this case is committed from January 28, 2014 to the same year by the defendant.

7. Until May 7, 2000 won or more deposited and gambling at a private sports territory site is not small to the extent of illegality.

In addition, since the crime of gambling is highly harmful to the general public by promoting an excessive spirit of gambling and neglecting the home economy, it is necessary to strictly overcome it. In addition, even though the defendant was sentenced to a fine for gambling in 201, the crime of gambling in this case is committed in addition, even though he was sentenced to a fine for the crime of gambling in 2011.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.