However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:00 on March 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Defendant: (b) on the ground that the Defendant: (c) around 10:00 on the ground that the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Defendant: (d) “Ising, does not live; (b) I does not refuse to live; and (c) I does not want to live,” (d) the Defendant: (c) occupied the gas bags; and (d) was in a balcony in a small balcony with a fire attached to a flood; and (e) was put in a balcony with a small number of floors; and (e) caused the Defendant to spread to the small size of 207 by the balcony of No. 207, where D, etc., is located below that thirth.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed F-owned Nos. 307 and D used for his residence by setting fire to F-owned Nos. 207.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, D, G, and F;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. A report on the results of field meals, a report on the results of a fire site identification, and a report on the scene of a fire;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each internal investigation report (307 on-site photographs, 307 quotations);

1. Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 164 of the choice of punishment (Optional to Imprisonment with labor for a period of time);

1. Articles 10(2) and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness [a] Articles 10 subparag. 2 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act [a] appears to have somewhat improved the situation until the closing date of the pleadings of the instant case for long-term hospitalized treatment, but according to his opinion on September 21, 2016, the issuance of I Hospital J by the defense counsel submitted by the defense counsel, the Defendant is presumed to have seriously damaged his/her ability to determine or change the situation due to severe symptoms at the time of the instant fire-prevention, and the statement by neighboring residents (Evidence 17, 26, 36 of the evidence record) and on-site identification report (Evidence 58 pages of the evidence record];

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months from fifteen years to fifteen years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] shall be general standards for fire prevention.