A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 10, 2016, at around 23:10 on November 23:10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol together with B at a “E restaurant operated by the victim D (65 years) of the victim D (65 years) located in the Busan East-gu, Busan; (b) was refused by the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant viewed that “the Defendant would drink alcohol together; and (c) was able to take a large sound to read “the Defendant’s side to drink”; and (d) the Defendant interfered with the operation of the above restaurant by force for about 30 minutes from that time, such as destroying the electricity route equivalent to KRW 200,00 at the market price attached to the table.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim and interfered with the business of the victim.

B. On the same date, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant: (a) was arrested a flagrant offender from the police officer G belonging to the F District of the F District Police Station located in Busan Dong Police Station, Busan, by receiving the said victim’s 112 report on the said reasons; and (b) was assaulted by G by “I sarbling the franch, sarbing the franch,” and “I sarbling the franch,” and assaulted G, by hand, on his hand, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as Defendant B’s paragraph (a) and for the foregoing reasons, arrested Defendant A from the above police officer G for a flagrant offender, and Defendant B assaulted G by “A” as “I am gue gue, mistakenly flafed, mistakenly flafed, so that I am flafed,” and assaulted G, by hand, by means of a flabing flaps of G, and flafing the face of G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to D and G.