공문서위조등
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 2012, Defendant A’s fraud used LGU mobile phone in the victim F’s name; however, Defendant A’s use of the mobile phone was overdue; the card price and interest on loan was overdue; and the credit bad condition was delayed; Defendant A’s use of the mobile phone under the victim’s name changed its number to KT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KT”); and Defendant A’s continued use of the mobile phone at a discount.
On June 25, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would move the LGU mobile phone used in his/her name to KT in his/her name after moving his/her number to KT, and immediately move in his/her name in his/her name after paying the unpaid charge.”
However, as seen above, the Defendant had been in bad credit standing due to the failure to pay interest on loans of KRW 8 million in arrears and KRW 600,000 per month, and was thought to continue to use the mobile phone device used in the victim’s name in the name of the victim by changing it to KT, and there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone use fee or change it in the name of the Defendant.
Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) obtained permission to move a mobile phone number from the victim to transfer his/her name on the same day on the same day; (b) opened KT mobile phone in the victim’s name; (c) used the aforementioned KT mobile phone device under the victim’s name from around that time to May 2014; and (d) did not pay an amount equivalent to KRW 1,207,890 of the usage fee, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.
2. On June 25, 2013, Defendant A’s forgery of private documents, uttering of private investigation documents, and uttering of private electronic records, etc., and uttering of private electronic records, etc.;
A. On June 25, 2013, the Defendant, at the above “H” office around June 25, 2013, is in the name F from F to F.