If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, they shall be prohibited.

Defendants are in the post-high line, and victims D(18 years of age) and victims E(18 years of age) are friendships.

At around 02:10 on February 15, 2015, the Defendants heard the horses that Defendant B was walked with Defendant B’s friendship in the GPC room where Defendant B was her part, and the Defendant B sent the victim D to the PC room through the victim’s friendship H with the victim’s friendship, and sent the head to the victim D one time at a drinking time, the victim’s knife with the left hand at one time, and the victim D’s knife the knife at one time, the Defendant A took the face of the victim D with his hand, walked the victim D’s knife at the victim D’s knife and the knife knife at four times.

Defendant A continuously called the victim E and arrived at the PC by the victim E, and the victim E who received the victim's phone arrived at the PC, the victim E face is 3 times on the floor of hand, Defendant B made the victim E's bucks one time with drinking, and Defendant B made the victim E's bucks at one time with the hand floor.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Relevant Article 2(2) and (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 2(1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment (the name of a crime in which a fine is written is separately stated, but it is deemed that there is an error in the name of a crime in which violence is written) (Article 2(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;