A. At around 13:50 on May 11, 2016, H driven an IPoter Ⅱ (hereinafter “instant cargo vehicle”) and driven a one-lane road in front of the Yannam-gun, Jindo-gun, which is located in the view map of the former Jindo-gun, into the view of K village, caused a traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) involving the Plaintiff, who was walking on the same side as the above road, and was found late to the end, resulting in the Plaintiff’s traffic accident involving the Plaintiff as part of the right-hand headlight of the instant cargo vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Plaintiff A was diagnosed with a so-called thirmosis under the 8 weeks of external wounds, where there is no head open room for 8 weeks of treatment due to the instant accident, and with a so-called thirmosis under the influence of external wounds, where there is no head open room for the head, and a thirmosis for 4 weeks of treatment.

C. As of the date of the closing of the argument in this case, Plaintiff A shows symptoms, such as sporadism accompanied by sporadism and sporadism, and thus, Plaintiff A needs to improve brain functions and sporadism for two parts and sporadism within a life-sustaining period. Rehabilitation treatment, including pain and walking training, is necessary every one year as of May 11, 2018, and needs to be provided during a life-sustaining period.

Plaintiff

B is the husband of the plaintiff A, and the plaintiff C, D, E, and F are the children of the plaintiff A.

E. As to the instant cargo vehicle, the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the maximum coverage on November 23, 2015 to September 28, 2016 with respect to the instant cargo (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 2-1 through 8, and Evidence No. 3, respectively, and the reply of the previous North Korean University Hospital to the commission of physical examination by this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is the insurer of the freight of this case, and Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.