2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 25, 1996 with respect to D forest 3,570 square meters (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s land”).

B. The Defendant is the owner of 215 square meters prior to the Jeonnam-gun C (hereinafter “instant Defendant’s land”).

C. The value of the road 18,391 square meters (hereinafter “instant meritorious services”) is owned by the State.

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff would build a new building on the Plaintiff’s land. Since there was no passage between the land and the public road, there is no way to use the land, the Plaintiff sought against the Defendant the confirmation of the right to passage over surrounding land, such as the purport of the claim, and the prohibition of interference with passage, by asserting that, among the Defendant’s land, the Defendant, which is the surrounding land, the number of points of No. 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 1 are connected in order to each point of No. 1, 2, 34 square meters in total, and 34 square meters in total, from among the Defendant’

B. It is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff could not have access to the Defendant’s land, or required excessive expenses, unless the Plaintiff passes the Defendant’s land or passes the Defendant’s land on a passage. There is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 2 and 3 and the entire purport of the pleadings as a result of the on-site inspection by this Court, the fact that the Plaintiff’s contribution to the instant land was a road entered in the public account, but it was merely a small way that the present vehicle could not pass. On the other hand, the opposite side of the Defendant’s land is the way to access the Defendant’s land to the forest of YU, YU, Nam-gun, U.S. Forest, adjacent to the instant land.